“The Beaker Proves It”
Message preached by
1. Do you ever make mistakes? I know that I do … in fact I made a mistake
last Sunday … we took a bible knowledge test and I gave the wrong answer. Let’s be honest and see how many of you
caught that I made a mistake? I asked the question, “What is the only book in the Bible that does
not specifically use God’s name? And
I gave the options, Lamentations, Ezra and Ruth … what is the correct
answer? Esther!
2. Mistakes are common to humans … but what about God
and the Bible
a. For centuries, mankind has been questioning the
validity and truthfulness of scripture.
b. Bertrand Russell said, “If I someday stand before
God and he asks me why I never put my faith in Him, I will say I hadn’t been
given enough evidence.”[1]
c. Not enough evidence … is that true?
d. [get one more quote … at least]
3. … that is
the focus of our study this month, to discover what evidence there is.
a. Is the bible reliable and what difference does it
make anyway?
b. So what if the bible has some mistakes and some
discrepancies … does that matter?
c. Think about this … if 5 cc’s of some medicine
could cure you, but 10 would make you sicker than a dog … would you care if a
nurse or doctor made a little mistake?
d. If you bought a $400 suit and charged it to your
credit card, would you care ff your credit card company made a little mistake
and said that the purchase really cost $400,000?
e. Image that you live near a military base that is
conducting bombing exercises. Would you
care if the tactician made a minor mistake in determining the coordinates for
the bomb to hit so that it happened to hit your home?
f.
The reality
is this – if the bible isn’t reliable in all accounts then how do you know what
you can and cannot rely upon. If I
cannot depend upon the truthfulness on the story of Jonah and the whale, then
how do you know you can depend upon the promise of heaven?
4. There is a lot at stake here, not just the
credibility of the bible, but all of the promises that we claim.
5. Our series is, “The Unbreakable Bible”
a. The goal of the series is to present evidence to
you for you to weigh and to consider.
b. My goal is not to mesmerize you with all of the
facts and evidence so that you have no other choice but to accept the bible as
true.
c. Rather, I see my job as laying out the evidence
before you … and then you can decide.
d. Last week we went digging in the dirt and discovered evidence from archaeology.
e. Today, I have even better stuff.
f.
Not
everyone is as interested in archeology as I am. But all of us had to take a science class.
SCIENCE ANSWERS - FROM
KIDS
A vibration is a motion
that cannot make up its mind which way it wants to go.
Vacuums are nothings.
We only mention them to let them know we know they are there.
When people run around
and around in circles, we say they are crazy.
When planets do it, we say they are orbiting.
Some people can tell
what time it is by looking at the sun. But I have never been able to make out
the numbers.
You can listen to
thunder after lightening and tell how close you came to getting hit. If you
don't hear it, you got hit, so never mind.
6.
As we consider the scientific evidence, it is important to realize that
the bible is not a scientific textbook.
a. That was not it’s design and intent.
b. And yet, what we discover in the bible in the area
of scientific and medical discoveries are completely in line with recent
medical discoveries and practices.
c. Does that lend credibility and validity to the
truthfulness of scripture? You bet!
7. As we study together the scientific evidence for
the accuracy of the bible this morning Grant Jeffery, author of Signature of
God challenges us to ask this question: “How could the writers of scripture
possibly know these facts unless they were supernaturally inspired by God?”[2]
I. Hydrology
A.
Did you know that the Bible describes the
hydrological cycle of weather?
1.
You know the process, it rains, then the water
runs off into creeks and rivers which run to the seas and oceans, which then
evaporate and rise to the clouds.
2.
Then the cycle begins again.
3.
Well the Bible describes this process and
analogy:
Ecclesiastes 1:7, All the rivers run into the sea, yet the sea is not full; To the place from which the rivers come, There they return again.
Isaiah 55:10, For as
the rain comes down, and the snow from heaven, And do not return there, But
water the earth, And make it bring forth and bud, That it may give seed to the
sower And bread to the eater
B.
What about the seas and the ability to navigate
the waterways of the seas?
1. Matthew
Maury undertook a research project based on Scripture, and once again confirmed
the scientific accuracy of the Bible. Maury was in charge of the Charts and
Instruments in the Hydrographic Office of the United States Navy from
1841-1861. He was a Christian who loved and respected the Word of God.
2. One
day in the 8th Psalm, he read the following words
Psalm 8:6-8, You
made him ruler over the works of your hands; you put everything under his
feet: all flocks and herds, and the
beasts of the field, the birds of the air, and the fish of the sea, all that
swim the paths of the seas.
3. You
and I probably could read that many times, and although we would understand
much about the great truths expressed in this psalm, we might miss something
highly significant, but which did not escape Maury's attention.
a. Being
one who was familiar with some of the problems that beset the sailing industry
of that day, Maury immediately recognized the significance of verse 8.
b. That
verse tells us that, among other things, God has given man dominion over the
beasts of the field, the fowl of the air, the fish of the sea, and whatsoever
passes through the paths of the sea. "The Bible says there are
paths in the sea," Maury thought, "and if the Bible says it, I
believe it."
4. He
was also aware of Ecclesiastes 1:6-7, which states: " The wind blows to the south and turns to the north; round and round it goes, ever
returning on its course. All streams flow into the sea, yet the sea is never
full. To the place the streams come from, there they return again.
5. Maury,
on the basis of the Bible, concluded that there are well-established wind
circuits, and that there are literally "paths in the sea" - that is,
definite currents in the ocean.
a. He reasoned that if these wind currents and ocean currents could be located and plotted, this information would be of great value to marine navigators.
b. Utilizing
this information, the sailing vessels could be directed along routes that would
take advantage of these sea and air currents, reducing by many days the time
required to traverse the seas.
6. Many
of Maury's contemporaries, of course, would have scoffed at Maury. They would
have said, "Maury, do you really mean that you are going to spend hour
after hour on some wild goose chase searching through those dusty old logs and
charts you have in your office just because the Bible says there are paths in
the sea?"
7. That
is precisely what Maury did, however, and the Biblical statements were
precisely verified. Maury found and plotted the wind circuits and the ocean
currents.
a. The
ocean currents include, for example, the great Gulf Current - a
"path in the sea" forty miles wide and 2000 feet deep flowing from
the
b. This
current has a tremendous influence on the climate of
c. The
massive
d.
Other paths of the seas that come to mind are the
e.
CNN ran a news report in May 1996, of marine
scientists' discovery of a massive river of water flowing north beneath the
f.
Maury's native state, the State of
8. Was Matthew Maury really a genius, or was he simply one who trusted the Bible as the inerrant Word of God? Whether he was a genius or not, it was not his genius, but his faith in the Bible that directed his efforts into a scientific research project, the results of which fully vindicated that faith.
C. Jonah
and the Great Fish[5]
1. Skeptics
ridicule many portions of Scripture and let's face it—some of them are
difficult to believe. Certainly one that has received a major dose of such
ridicule deals with Jonah and the whale (or great fish). How could a whale or
fish swallow a man whole? How could a man survive in such an environment for
any length of time? As always, there are answers to the questions if we are
willing to study and believe.
2. First,
let me say that the historicity of this account is vital to the Christian. Believing
it is not an option, for Jesus Christ Himself believed it and made it a
model for the doctrine of His resurrection.
"For as Jonah was three days
and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days
and three nights in the heart of the earth (Matthew 12:40).
3. What
kind of animal swallowed Jonah? In the passage above, the Greek word translated
"whale" actually means a huge fish or sea monster.
a. In
the passage in Jonah (
b. Our
modern taxonomic system places whales among the mammals, sharks, among the fish
and plesiosaurs among the reptiles, but, the Bible uses a different system.
"All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of
men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds." (
I Corinthians 15:39).
4. Evidently
any living thing other than the creeping things (Psalm 104:25) in the seas is
placed in the category of "fishes".
a. In addition, there are several species of whale and of sharks alive today with gullets large enough to swallow a man whole.
b. Among extinct animals like the plesiosaurs, the same could be said, and perhaps this was a heretofore unknown fish of large size.
c. The
point is, the story is not impossible.
5. However,
most importantly, the Bible says that "the Lord had prepared a great fish
to swallow up Jonah" (Jonah
a. Clearly this event was miraculous and not a naturalistic phenomenon.
b. Thus
we don’t have to give it an explanation limited by modern experience or
knowledge.
6. Could
a man survive in a fish’s belly?
a. The Hebrew idiom "three days and three nights" has been clearly shown both from Scripture and other sources to mean a period of time beginning on one day and ending on the day after the one following. It doesn't necessarily mean three full days and nights.
b. Furthermore,
there have been several reported cases of modern sailors or other individuals
swallowed by such an animal, only to be recovered many hours later.
7. But
again, this story involves the miraculous.
a. It may be that Jonah actually died and was resurrected by God.
b. This is implied in his description of his experience especially Jonah 2:2.
c. Of
course, resurrection is "impossible" but it clearly happened on
several occasions in Scripture requiring miraculous input.
8.
The point is nothing about the story is totally
impossible: There are "fish" large enough to swallow a man; men have
been known to survive inside a "fish"; the Bible says it really
happened; Christ said Jonah’s experience was an analogy of His own death and
resurrection; and God is alive and capable of this feat.
II.
Astronomy
Edward Boyd
said this to his son, Christian philosopher Gregory Boyd, “So if I want to
avoid hell, I presumably have to believe that a snake talked to Eve, that a
virgin got pregnant from God, that a whale swallowed a prophet, that the
He has Mr Boyd as recorded in, Psalm 19:1
[reference]
“In fact, it’s
written across the heavens so vividly that more and more scientists who search
the stars are becoming Christians.”[7]
The great
cosmologist Allan Sandage, who won astronomy’s version of the Nobel Prize,
concluded that God is ‘the explanation for the miracle of existence.’ Sir Fred
Hoyle, who devised the steady state theory of the universe to avoid the
existence of God eventually became a believer in an Intelligent Designer of the
universe. Others like Hugh Ross and his
research on quasars and galaxies, said scientific and historical evidence
‘deeply rooted my confidence in the veracity of the Bible.
A.
The Lord challenged Abraham to count the stars to
demonstrate the awesome number that He had created by His supernatural power.
Genesis
22:17, I will bless you, and multiplying I will
multiply your descendants as the stars of the heaven and as the sand which is
on the seashore; and your descendants shall possess the gate of their enemies.
1.
“Then He brought
him outside and said, ‘Look now toward heaven, and count the stars if you are
able to be” (Genesis
2.
The unaided human eye can see and can see and count
about 1,029 stars.
a. With a pair of binoculars or an inexpensive telescope you can see over 3,300 stars.
b. So up until the last hundred years or so, people would read that scripture and say, HEY, THE BIBLE IS WRONG HERE.”
c.
There are only a few thousand stars and certainly not
as many stars as sand.
3.
Since God spoke those words to Abraham, what has
science discovered? Do those discoveries contradict the teachings of scripture?
4.
In the last few years modern telescopes have allowed us
to view over two hundred million stars in our own galaxy call the Milky
Way. And many other galaxies beyond
ours.
B.
The Bible also says that each star is unique.
1 Corinthians
1.
All stars look alike to the naked eye.
a. Even when seen through a telescope, they seem to be just points of light.
b.
However, analysis of their light spectra reveals that
each is unique and different from all others
2. The
King James Version translators confirmed that Amos’ original Hebrew statement
about “the seven stars” referred to the constellation Pleiades and Orion”
(Amos 5:8 [NKJV]).
a. Early
translators were puzzled by this verse because there were only six stars that
could be seen by the naked eye in the constellation Pleiades.
b. Now,
however, modern telescopes have revealed the existence of a seventh star in
Pleiades; it is so dim that only a telescope can detect it.
c. How
else did Amos know that there were
“seven stars” in the constellation unless God told him?
d.
The bible was correct all along in its
description of “seven stars” as recorded by the prophet Amos over twenty-five
centuries ago.
C. Circle of the earth
1.
Listen to Isaiah 40:22
He
sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like
grasshoppers. He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out
like a tent to live in.
a. This expression “the circle of the earth” clearly describes the earth as a sphere or globe. The actual word means sphere.
b.
Now let me ask you something. When Isaiah wrote the Bible, did people
believe the world was round? No, it was written in the 7TH century BC.
Even in 1492 when
D.
The Earth is suspended in nothing
"He spreads out the northern [skies] over empty
space; he suspends the earth over nothing" Job 26:7
1. Greeks
taught held up by Atlas. – on back of
elephant – back of turtle – “no use, it’s turtles all the way down.” TO WHAT?
2.
Jewish scholars in
E. Intelligent
design
1.
After examining the complexity of the variables that
govern this solar system and our planet earth many scientists have declared
that this solar system is "anthropic." This word simply means,
that this earth bears evidence that it was designed by a superior intelligence
to allow human life to exist. The
scientists use this word "anthropic" to indicate that they have
discovered an astonishing number of scientific variables that fit within a very
narrow range that allows human life to exist on this planet. Let me explain.
a. If our earth were located much farther away from our sun we would freeze like the planet Mars.
b. If it were much closer to the sun then we would be burned up like the hot surface of Mercury or the 860-degree temperature on Venus.
c. If the magnetic forces within our planet were stronger or weaker, life could not exist.
d. If our earth did not revolve every twenty-four hours then one-half of the planet would be in permanent darkness without vegetation. NO VEGGIES – SOME OF YOU WOULD LIKE THAT.
e.
Meanwhile, if the earth did not revolve, the
other side of the planet would be an uninhabitable desert as it suffered from
the overwhelming heat of permanent exposure to the sun. If out earth were not tilted at twenty-three
degrees, we would not have the seasonal variation that produces the
incredible abundance of crops that feed our planet's huge population.
f.
The moon produces the tides that continually
replenish the oceans with oxygen allowing the fish to breathe. If the earth were significantly smaller,
the lessened gravity would be incapable of holding the atmosphere that is
essential for breathing. A much thinner
atmosphere would provide no protection from the 25,000 meteors
that burn up in the atmosphere over the earth every day. In addition, a thinner atmosphere would be
incapable of retaining the higher temperatures required for human and animal
life to exist. If our planet earth were
twice as large, the effect of increased gravity would make everything on
the planet's surface weigh eight times what it weighs today. . GREAT FOR JENNY CRAIG BUT BAD FOR US . This increased
weight would destroy many forms of animal and human life
2.
In other words, if the universe was changed in the
slightest way, no human life could exist.
The ultimate conclusion of these scientists is that our universe, solar
system and, especially, our earth was purposely constructed by a very powerful
intelligence within very narrow scientific parameters to allow human life to
flourish. The prophet Nehemiah wrote the
following declaration centuries before the birth of Jesus Christ:
"You
alone are the Lord; you have made heaven, the heaven of heavens, with all their
host, The earth and everything on it, The Seas and all that is in them. And You preserve them all. The host of heaven worships You" (Nehemiah 9:6).
3. SO,
if we can fully appreciate the truth that has been carried out in scripture, we
can trust it’s true.
III.
Medical Proofs
A.
The ignorant past
1.
“To cure pinkeye apply the urine of a faithful
wife.” This prescription comes from the
famous Ebers Papyrus, a medical book from 1500 BC. Of course this treatment was useless and
dangerous. But if the pinkeye did not
get better fast, the poor woman probably had to explain herself. The Ebers Papyrus gives us a picture of
medicine in ancient
2.
Some remedies were harmless, but others created
greater problems. “To splinters, the
ancient Egyptian doctors applied a salve of worm blood and donkey dung. Since dung is loaded with tetanus spores, a
simple splinter often resulted in a gruesome death from lockjaw.
3.
Moses lived in
4.
Here God made a fantastic promise – freedom from
disease. God gave Moses many health
rules, filling a whole section of the Bible.
Here is the clincher, Moses recorded hundreds of health regulations but
not a single current medical misconception.[8]
B.
In the book of Genesis God specifically directed
Abraham to circumcise all newborn males on the eighth day (Genesis
1. A remarkable discovery by twentieth-century scientists has shed light on a possible reason for circumcision on the eighth day. When an infant is born the blood clotting mechanism is immature. Any cut or injury in the first few days of life can result in excessive bleeding. After several days of life, the vitamin K in the infants diet allows an important blood clotting factor, called prothrombin, to be produced in sufficient amounts to effect efficient clotting of the blood.
2.
Today infants are given an injection of vitamin
K at birth. Consequently, efficient blood clotting is established within hours.
Without such therapy, it turns out that the prothrombin concentration reaches
its peak on the eighth day of life! What a coincidence.
3.
Gen. 17:12 And he that is eight days old
shall be circumcised among you, every man child in your generations, he that is
born in the house, or bought with money of any stranger, which [is] not of thy
seed.
4.
The command to circumcise Jewish boys on the eighth
day was no accident. The important blood clotting vitamin K2 in blood is
not manufactured in a baby's intestinal tract in normal amounts until the 5th
to 7th day of their lives. A second element necessary for blood clotting is
prothrombin . The presence of this element decreases in an infant for the first
3 days of its life, then suddenly spurts to a maximum level on the eighth
day, after which it settles to its norm for the rest of the child's life.
[9]
5.
The skeptic might argue that the Jews deciphered the
correct day by trial and error. However, there are many cultures that
circumcise their young on the first, fourth, sixth, seventh and twentieth days
of life. If the Jews determined by trial and error that the eighth day was
best, why did these cultures come to such different conclusions? Could it be
that Abraham was given "inside information" from the One that created
the clotting mechanism in the first place?
C.
There are dozens of additional examples of advanced
Bio-medical knowledge in the Bible.
1.
In the book of Deuteronomy 23:12-14, Moses
instructed the Israelites to bury human waste products for hygienic purposes.
While the merits of this procedure seem obvious to us now, during the Middle
Ages Europe was nearly wiped out because they failed to heed this advice. As a
direct result of dumping human waste into the streets, millions of people died
from the "Black Plague," a disease caused by the microscopic organism
Yersinia Pestis. These organisms thrived in the human waste and were carried
into the homes by fleas on the backs of rats! Had they simply followed the
biblical teaching these horrible plagues would never have occurred.
2. In Leviticus 17:11 God stated that "…the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it to you upon the altar to make atonement for your souls; for it is the blood that makes atonement for the soul." This statement, "the life of the flesh is in the blood," implies that the blood contains vital ingredients that sustain the life of animals and man.
3.
Though this statement may seem obvious to us
now, this has not always been the case. In recent times it was believed that
the blood needed to be "let out" when people fell ill. Consequently,
for centuries physicians practiced "blood letting" (draining the
blood out of an individual) in an attempt to rid the body of unwanted poisons.
As you might guess many of these people died from the procedure. In fact,
George Washington was a victim of this very procedure at the end of his life!
4. In the twentieth century, medical science has proven true this statement of Moses. The blood of man and animals carries all of the necessary nutrients for the maintenance and repair of living systems. Without a functioning cardiovascular system and an adequate supply of blood, there can be no life–something that Moses understood nearly 3,500 years ago!
5.
http://www.marshill.org/Apologetics%20Pages/science_and_the_Bible.htm
D.
Where the Bible speaks on scientific subjects, it is
accurate centuries ahead of its time.
1. For example, in a book entitled None of These Diseases by S.I. McMillen, M.D. 1, the doctor cites various hygiene laws God gave to Israel. These were far ahead of the knowledge of the scientific world of that time. Here are a few examples.
2. Deut. 23:12-13. Thou shalt have a place also without the camp, whither thou shalt go forth abroad: And thou shalt have a paddle upon thy weapon; and it shall be, when thou wilt ease thyself abroad, thou shalt dig therewith, and shalt turn back and cover that which cometh from thee.
3. We may be prone to laugh at something like this in our day. However, in the eighteenth century in Europe, human excrement was cast into the streets of cities in ignorance, giving rise to epidemics of typhoid, cholera and dysentery.
4. We will cite just one more example. In relatively recent years the medical professions have been warning against the build up of cholesterol in our veins since it may cause clogging and a heart attack. A large source of cholesterol is animal fat. Hear what God told Moses centuries ago 4.
5. Lev 3:17. [It shall be] a perpetual statute for your generations throughout all your dwellings, that ye eat neither fat nor blood.
CONCLUSION
1. So what does it matter?
a. The Bible is not a scientific textbook, that was
never its purpose.
b. Yet, if you find a book written thousands of years
old, that has never been contradicted, wouldn’t you want to pay attention to
it?
c. Accuracy itself is not a testament to being of
God, yet 100% accuracy in the archaeological and scientific aspects of the
Bible are a strong basis to answering the question, is this from God? Which we will look at next week.